Perceived Training Needs of Maritime Doctors and General Practitioners

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Centre of Maritime Health and Society, School of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark

2 Hippokration Hospital Athens, Greece & Frederick University, Nicosia, Cyprus

Abstract

Introduction: Medical practitioners provide pre-employment examinations and periodic health examinations to seafarers, fishermen, offshore employees, and maritime students to ensure that they are fit for work. So far, very little is known about doctors’ perceptions of their professional training needs and expectations. The objective of this study was to gain insight on (a) the breadth of services offered, (b) follow-up practices, and (c) perceived training needs on aspects of maritime medicine.
Methods: All maritime doctors (110) recognized by the Danish Maritime Authority (DMA) and 100 general practitioners (GPs) were invited to participate. A questionnaire was sent out electronically to gather information on the demographics, breadth of services, follow-up practices, and perceived training needs of the participants. Descriptive statistics described the characteristics of the 2 groups.
Results: The training priorities of maritime doctors were rules and regulations (68.7%) followed by working conditions and health risks aboard ship (62.8%). The self-rated training priorities of the GPs were working conditions and health risks aboard ship (44.1%), occupational disease diagnostics, prevention, and follow-up (41.1%), and health and safety at work (38.2%).
Conclusion: Members of both medical disciplines were in favor of flexible and accredited training. More specifically, GPs considered a course in occupational risks, diseases, and follow up targeting high-risk professions very important. Maritime doctors suggested the establishment of a website as a one-stop shop for relevant guidelines and information. The small size of the GPs sample prevented a more in-depth gap analysis; however, the results could be used to help the respective authorities establish relevant training programs.

Keywords


  1. Chiodini JH, Anderson E, Driver C, et al. Recommendations for the practice of travel medicine. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2012;10(3):109- 128. doi:10.1016/j.tmaid.2012.05.002.
  2. Peeters M. Free movement of medical doctors: the new Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications. Eur J Health Law. 2005;12(4):373-396. doi:10.1163/157180905775088586.
  3. Henny C, Hartington K, Scott S, Tveiten A, Canals L. The business case for telemedicine. Int Marit Health. 2013;64(3):129-135. doi:10.1016/j.admp.2013.07.155.
  4. Lefkowitz RY, Slade MD, Redlich CA. Risk factors for merchant seafarer repatriation due to injury or illness at sea. Int Marit Health. 2015;66(2):61-66. doi:10.5603/IMH.2015.0016.
  5. Poulsen TR, Burr H, Hansen HL, Jepsen JR. Health of Danish seafarers and fishermen 1970-2010: What have register-based studies found? Scand J Public Health. 2014;42(6):534-545. doi:10.1177/1403494814534538.
  6. Andrioti D, Faurby MD, Le JV, Jensen OC. Do Danish Maritime Doctors Value Continuous Education Initiatives? Health Econ Outcome Res. 2017;3(3):1-5. doi:10.4172/2471-268X/1000137.
  7. Maritime Labour Convention (MLC). https://www.dma.dk/Presse/temaer/MLC/Sider/default.aspx. Accessed November 29, 2018.
  8. International Labour Office (ILO). Guidelines on the medical examinations of seafarers. Geneva: ILO; 2013. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_dialogue/@sector/documents/ normativeinstrument/wcms_174794.pdf. Accessed November 9, 2018.
  9. Jepsen JR, Rasmussen HB. The metabolic syndrome among Danish seafarers: a follow-up study. Int Marit Health. 2016;67(3):129-136. doi:10.5603/IMH.2016.0025.
  10. Danish Maritime Authority. Medical examiners. https://www.dma.dk/SoefarendeBemanding/LaegeHelbred/Laegeundersoegelse/Soefartslaeger/Sider/default.aspx. Accessed November 9, 2018.
  11. World Health Organization (WHO). The world health report 2006 - working together for health. Geneva: WHO; 2006. http://www.who.int/whr/2006/en/. Accessed November 9, 2018.
  12. Regnier K, Kopelow M, Lane D, Alden E. Accreditation for learning and change: quality and improvement as the outcome. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2005;25(3):174-182. doi:10.1002/chp.26.
  13. Overstreet KM, Eidsvoog KE, Orsetti RF, Parochka JN, Pennington FC, Ruppenkamp J. Educational interventions and outcomes—a literature review of CME regarding Institute of Medicine (IOM) competencies. CE Measure. 2006;1(1):17-26. doi:10.1532/CEM06.06201.
  14. Mantia VAL. European Commission launches recommendations on effective, accessible and resilient health systems. Eurodiaconia; 2014. https://www.eurodiaconia.org/de/2014/05/european-commission-launches-recommendations-on-effective-accessible-and-resilient-health-systems/. Accessed November 29, 2018.
  15. Abaya AR, Roldan S, Ongchangco JC, Ronquillo-Sarmiento RM, Sarmiento RF. Repatriation rates in Filipino seafarers: a five-year study of 6,759 cases. Int Marit Health. 2015;66(4):189-195. doi:10.5603/IMH.2015.0038.
  16. Oldenburg M, Baur X, Schlaich C. Occupational risks and challenges of seafaring. J Occup Health. 2010;52(5):249-256. doi:10.1539/joh.K10004.
  17. Roberts SE, Nielsen D, Kotlowski A, Jaremin B. Fatal accidents and injuries among merchant seafarers worldwide. Occup Med (Lond). 2014;64(4):259-266. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqu017.
  18. Altaf Chowdhury SA, Smith J, Trowsdale S, Leather S. HIV/AIDS, health and wellbeing study among International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF) seafarer affiliates. Int Marit Health. 2016;67(1):42- 50. doi:10.5603/IMH.2016.0009.
  19. World Health Organization (WHO). Overview - Preventing chronic diseases: a vital investment. WHO; 2005. http://www.who.int/chp/chronic_disease_report/part1/en/. Accessed November 29, 2018.
  20. Tu M, Jepsen JR. Hypertension among Danish seafarers. Int Marit Health. 2016;67(4):196-204. doi:10.5603/IMH.2016.0037.